Thursday, June 24, 2010

CNN's "Gary & Tony Have A Baby" Premieres tonight!

Talking to Gary & Tony and their adorable baby Nicholas
Tonight @ 8pm CNN's continues thier "In America" series with "Gary & Tony Have A Baby". Last week I went to GLAAD and CNN's screening of the documentary, and got to meet the happy and loving family. It was a very touching and well done piece. I would rather have two loving, attentitive gay parents, then two unhappy, workaholic "straight" parents on their 3rd divorce each, just sayin'.
CNN's Solidad O'Brian (no, we're not sisters, but I wish we were!)
w/ my friends Cindi Creager (GLAAD) and her wife Rainie Cole

All the panelists after the screening
Gary, Tony, their baby Nicholas, and GLAAD'S ED Jarrett Barrios

Tuesday, June 22, 2010

"Trans Party"! All trans musician concert and party hosted by Frameline!

Last night Frameline hosted one of the funnest trans music parties ever called "Trans Party" at the chic hot spot "Supperclub". The party was immediately following the festival's screening of "Riot Acts: Flaunting Gender Variance in Music Performance", called a "transfabulous rocku-mentary", and featured many popular trans performers including Katastophe, Joshua Klipp, Lipstick Conspiracy, Shawna Virago who all performed on stage at "Trans Party".

Hanging out with the all trans girl rock band Lipstick Conspiracy. They opened up the lineup, and were on fire!

With my friend, music artist and dancer Joshua Klipp (middle)

Singer Joshua Klipp ended the concert, and of course all the girls rushed him after his set! Klipp is a favorite of MTV's Logo, and is a regular on Logo's "New, Now, Next" music show, and even hosts the show from time to time. Check him out: http://www.myspace.com/cutelittlewhiteguy.
The all trans girl rock band "Lipstick Conspiracy" opened up the concert for a whole hour. Listen to their music: http://www.myspace.com/lipstickconspiracy

With activist Allison D. Laureano and musician Imogen Binnie

I saw my friend Imogen Binnie, a punk rock musician and trans advocate. She was one of my first friends I met the first time I came to San Fran. I came to SF a few years ago for the Transgender Leadership Summit, and she was sitting next to me in a workshop, and we both had similar ideas and clicked. I kid with her and call her "the trans Chloe Sevigny", which she totally looks like! Last year Imogen performed a song at the Trans March that protested the anti-trans slur "tra**y", and I was happy she understood the stigma and dehumanization that the pejorative inspires.

Trans musician pioneer Shawna Virago rocks the house at the "Trans Party"

Friday, June 18, 2010

Frameline SF LGBT Film Festival Opening Night!

I'm so happy to be in California for a 10 week get away from the craziness and concrete jungle of New York City. First I am in San Fran for 3 weeks to go to Frameline Film Festival, and go to Pride. I'm making my first film! I have 3 LGBT characters in my screenplay, and wanted to be around other LGBT filmmakers. This is my 3rd time attending Frameline, and Opening Night is always so fun!
"> The Opening Night film was "The Secret Diary of Ann Lister", the true story of a lesbian woman in the early 1800's who defied society and did not conceal her sexuality at a time when most lesbian women married men as a means of surival. It was such a well done film, and I really felt the pain and challenges that the multiple women characters went through to be, or viel, who they were in a judgemental and superficial society.
With some friends I met a couple years ago when I was an organizer of the SF Trans March

The opening night gala was at the beautiful Botanical Gardens at Golden Gate Park. I ran into dozens of friends, some from SF, some from LA, and even a few from NY, and abroad. There was yummy food, fruity drinks and groovy music. It was like a family reunion, and was super fun.
With Tiffany Woods (producer of new doco "Trans Francisco"), her wife, and the director of the film and his wife.

with Andrea Krauss of Regent Films






Wednesday, May 19, 2010

The Hypocrisy of 'Glee's' Ryan Murphy Concerning "Nip/Tuck's" Transphobia (His Other Show)


Dear Ryan Murphy,

I’m starting this open letter by stating that I support your protest against Newsweek for publishing the “Straight Jacket” article by Ramin Setoodeh. It insensitively discussed gay male actors playing straight roles in a way that offended many gay men and their allies.

However, as an organizer of the anti-defamation organization MAGNET- Media Advocates Giving National Equality to Transsexual and Transgender People, I need to point out that you are hypocritically guilty of the same crime that you have called out Newsweek for as it relates to transsexual women and your show ‘Nip/Tuck’. The sad truth is that many transsexual and transgender women are offended by your own irresponsible and dehumanizing depictions of trans women on that show. We expect this from people who are ignorant of our community, but Ryan, as a gay man who purports to be an ally of everyone in the LGBT community, (and I would hope that includes transsexual women as well, not just gay men of privilege), you are held to a higher standard of behavior.


Images of women of transsexual experience should not be appropriated by gay male producers in a way that makes a mockery of our lives and further stigmatizes us.


We unveil your hypocrisy now because the oppression of transsexual women in the media is dangerously alienating. These poorly conceptualized images of transsexual women are not just created by straight producers alone. In many cases these offensive images are created by gay male producers. What does this say about the transphobia and/or ignorance that is evident within our own LGBT community? We hesitated from airing internal community issues publically, but since Hollywood is having a field day with all these sensational, inaccurate and harmful images of transsexual women in film and TV, we feel compelled to lift up the rug and clean out what keeps on getting swept under. Ryan Murphy, your show “Nip/Tuck” has been charged by many with negatively stereotyping transsexual women as hypersexualized, deceivers, mentally unstable, murderous, confused and dishonest in their gender. Thanks, but not thanks Ryan.


In Gina Kleinzeller’s blog, “Skip The Makeup”, she writes that, “…[certain LGBT organizations] back off dealing with transphobia when its source is from….someone with clout in the gay community (like Barney Frank or the producers of Nip/Tuck). When a perceived gay icon like Candis Cayne does a highly transphobic Nip/Tuck episode about detransition basically equating a trans woman as being a confused gay man, [certain LGBT organizations] ignores it even after being notified about complaints.”

Many LGBT organizations turn a blind eye when gay men with external power and influence oppress trans people. I agree Candis Cayne’s character on Nip/Tuck played into the harmful myth our detractors spread that trans women are “really gay men with women’s clothes on”. This is also the same propaganda our political enemies are spreading to keep us from gaining human rights. I would hate to think some in our LGBT community want transsexual people pigeonholed as a way of advancing only the gay and lesbian community’s agenda.

Willam Belli, a gay male actor with an offensive “transface” act, in which he mockingly impersonates transsexual women, was also on “Nip/Tuck”. Belli’s character has the drag queen like name “Cherry Peck”, refers to herself as “gay” and is called a “tra**y”. The “Ava Moore” character in Nip/Tuck is a transsexual woman who is depicted as mentally unstable, a deceiver and is even accused by her own son of incest, implying she’s a “pervert”.

You wrote in your open letter to Newsweek journalist Ramin Setoodeh that he “...published such a blatantly homophobic article”, yet, you can’t see that you produced a blatantly transphobic television show, and may I dare say a sexist and misogynistic show as well.

You complain that Setodeh‘s article is, “As misguided as it is shocking and hurtful”, but have failed to realize that Nip/Tuck’s depictions of transsexual women were not only unkind, but over the top sensational. In fact, it was so misguided, one has to wonder if you did any research on sensitivity, transsexual medical conditions or consulted with any transsexual women before allowing these characters, or should I say “caricatures”, to hit the screen.

You ask, “Would the magazine have published an article where the author makes a thesis statement that minority actors should only be allowed and encouraged to play domestics?”

And I ask you, “Would you produce a show that was just as offensive to gay men as Nip/Tuck was to transsexual women?”


You state that the article was a “…damaging, needlessly cruel, and mind-blowingly bigoted piece.” - Likewise, many transsexual women have written that your show’s portrayals of their community were all these things you excoriated Setoodeh for.


You slammed Mr. Setoodeh as being “a gay man deeply in need of some education”.

Ditto! Many people say that you, Mr. Ryan Murphy, are a gay man in dire need of accurate education concerning transsexual women, especially before exploiting them on television for shock value, ratings, objectification and financial gain.


You accuse the journalist of writing with a “poison pen”, however, the toxic message your show sends its viewers is at least just as poisonous to the acceptance and desegregation transsexual women struggle for from mainstream society every day.


You say Newsweek’s article suggests gay men “… should only identify themselves as “queeny” people (a word used by Setoodeh in the article) who stand at the back of the bus and embrace an outdated decades old stereotype.”, yet your own show reinforces every negative stereotype about transsexual women, and we too are fed with the “back of the bus”. You seem not to like the word “queeny”, but your show used the offensive pejorative “tra**y”. GLAAD and large segments of the trans community agree that the “t-word” is a derogatory slur. Even your friend Dustin Lance Black supports many in the trans community’s protest of that pejorative, recently telling The Advocate “…the word is hurtful….Why is this the same treatment the n-word has in the black community?”

Nip/Tuck caters mainly to heterosexual men, and the statistics show they perpetrate the most violence on trans women, resulting in hundreds and hundreds of murders, sexual assaults and hate crimes against trans women annually! This epidemic is only added to when inhumane media images plague us. To produce a show with story lines and characters that only incite more misunderstanding and negative stereotypes, (which leads to more violence), against women of trans experience, was very irresponsible of the producers of Nip/Tuck.

Just last month, Tribeca Film Festival’s selection “Ticked Off Trans[phobia] With Knives” was deemed transphobic, and boycotted by many in the trans community, their allies and GLAAD. Oddly, many of the gay male media outlets accused the trans community of “censorship” and insensitively told the women protesters to “lighten up”. Yet, just weeks later, when you and many in the gay male community boycotted Newsweek for being homophobic, the same gay male media outlets, and many gay men, did NOT cry “censorship” or say “lighten up” to the gay male protesters. Instead, they supported their anti-defamation cause, as they should have. It’s hypocritical though that they left the trans community behind in their time of need. This double standard is very telling.


There desperately needs to be some balance in the depictions Gay Inc produces of transsexual women. We need you and your associates in Gay Inc to stop only depicting trans women as male drag queens, crazy and/or as sex objects. How are we going to be taken seriously if we are only projected as jokes from our “allies”? And if you do include a trans woman character in your new show, “Glee”, please don’t hire a gay male drag queen to impersonate a trans woman, inlitrating her community, because that will only add to the “over the top” and “ridiculous caricature” stereotype that causes ignorant people to make light of our lives . If you happen to write me back, please don’t include a quote from a transsexual actress or non-profit employee “excusing your behavior”, for we all know they get paid to be “politically correct”, compromise, sell out for their career or say what the gay male establishment makes them say, which does not always serve transsexual liberation and feminism.

Please understand this letter isn’t a personal attack on you, we’re just holding your television show accountable like you’re holding Newsweek accountable. Perhaps you’re a well intentioned guy and ally, and were unaware that your show’s stigmatizing portrayals impede our progress when it comes to us gaining civil rights and social acceptance as transsexual people. If we, the LGBT family, want authentic equality, we need to step outside our own letter in the acronym and understand each other, so we can truly move in unity.

Sincerely,
Ashley Love and supporters of MAGNET

Tuesday, April 13, 2010

Trans Forming Media PSA Against TOTWK & Transphobia


Pictures montage from April 6th Protest @ Tribeca Cinemas to demand Tribeca Film Festival remove "Ticked Off Tra**ies With Knives" (other photos are also included) The movie makes light of violence and rape against trans women, exploits the high-profile murder of teenager Angie Zapata, includes the pejorative term trannies in its title, inaccurately depicts trans womens identities as drag queen performers and caricatures and misrepresents the lives of an extremely disenfranchised group who suffer violence at alarming rates.

Sunday, April 11, 2010

"An Image I'd Rather Forget" - My Synopsis & Critique Of TOTWK



Note: If you'd like to read my more detailed/longer synopsis of the film, email me at magnet_right_now@yahoo.com

The film “Ticked Off Tra**ies With Knives” spreads a fear, misogyny and hate stemmed ideology. I have seen the film and it’s very upsetting that people unfamiliar with transsexual and transgender women will walk away from the film with a stigmatizing perception of trans women. This film is dangerous propaganda, whether intentional or not. TOTWK leaves the viewer with the false impression that transsexual and transgender women are unauthentic in their gender identity and really “gay men in drag.” The film portrays all trans women as hypersexualized, jokes, murderous and/or unstable. This is not only inaccurate, it's offensive and incites further misunderstanding and violence.

A student of oppression in the media, I’m an organizer with a trans anti-defamation group named MAGNET-Media Advocates Giving National Equality to Trans People. MAGNET supports the thousands of people who signed GLAAD’s petition urging Tribeca to remove this film or joined the Boycott TOTWK Group. They’re warranted in their protest/boycott of this film whether or not they saw the entire movie. The clips available to the public were reason enough to take action.

  • Use of the dehumanizing pejorative and anti-trans slur “tra**ie” in the title.
  • Insensitively mentioning real trans victim’s of hate crimes names in the trailer (A reedited trailer removes the victim’s names).
  • Exploiting, devaluing and making light of the crisis of violence against trans women.
  • Director Israel Luna’s misrepresentation that the film’s about “transgender women”, but often insinuates that the characters are not women- but rather men drag performers, “caricatures” & “impersonators.”

While we have great respect and admiration for some of the actors in the film, we have great concerns with the director misrepresenting oppressed minorities for entertainment, and with Tribeca’s irresponsible decision to showcase this film. In GLAAD’s analysis of the film, they say, “Because of its positioning as a transgender film, viewers unfamiliar with the lives of transgender women will likely leave this film with the impression that transgender women are ridiculous caricatures of ’real women.’ It demeans actual transgender women who struggle for acceptance and respect in their day-to-day lives and to be valued for their contributions to our society.”

Many stand with GLAAD’s statement. Trans women are just that: women. They’re fighting to pass ENDA, gain APA/GID reform and health care rights, and establish acceptance in society. TOTWK threatens that acceptance immensely. The unhealthy stigma that this film encourages generates misunderstanding and resistance against trans Americans in a country that seriously lacks education, rights and acceptance of trans people.

Tribeca would never present a film with a title having the “N” word, an anti-Semitic slur, the misogynistic “c” word, or many other pejoratives. Tribeca considers the content of films they give a platform to. It’s disappointing that the humanity and safety of trans women was devalued by Tribeca’s programming department. It’s a sad sign of the times that our concerns about depiction and wellbeing are not considered on par with other minorities. Trans people need the same anti-defamation protections other oppressed minorities receive from Tribeca. We are exercising our freedom of speech by boycotting this film. “Cries of censorship” are just a diversion to take attention off the true issues, which are responsibility, accountability, humanity and oppression.

I find it biased and unethical that many male journalists/bloggers have failed to address the feminist side of this debate. The violence, objectification and dehumanization of women in this film are also being protested. It’s disappointing that this film’s controversy has spotlighted the issues of ignorance, transphobia and misogyny internalized within some in the gay men’s community who have opposed our protest, as well as society at large.

Characters in the film, performers in a drag queen show, describe themselves as “We have female qualities and characteristics….straight male personalities.” That description isn’t the definition of a transgender woman, and provokes prejudice. This is one of the roots of anti-trans sentiment: the falsehood that trans women’s gender identity is “fake”. This propaganda is the same that the religious right has been preaching in their campaign to slander trans Americans, denying them equal rights (see their "Do you want men in dresses teaching your children?" campaign), and now this film is doing their job for them! This isn’t a “women’s clothes fetish movement” for crying out loud! It’s about “internal” gender. Luna would have had fewer problems if he would have named his film “Ticked Off “Drag Queens” With Knives” (yet there would still be issues). Inaccurately, he decided to market the film saying it was about transgender “women”, yet portrayed them as over-the-top “impersonators” – actually mocking femininity. It stands to reason that transsexual and transgender feminists feel slighted, their identities misrepresented and attacked.

Merriam Webster defines a drag queen as “a male homosexual who dresses as a woman especially for comic or theatrical effect”. Completely different, a woman of transsexual experience is “a woman in which the sex-related structures of the brain that define gender identity are exactly opposite the physical sex organs of the body. Put even more simply, a transsexual woman has a mind that is literally, physically, trapped in a body of the opposite sex.” A person from the “transgender umbrella” is “someone whose personal idea of gender does not correlate with his or her assigned gender role.” The social political identity umbrella term “transgender” is good for gaining legislation to protect the broad community, yet the diversity of sub groups (who are equal, but different) within the broad community cannot be ignored. Certainly diversity is the spice of life!

Much of the dialog in the film is not only offensive, but effectively teaches the viewer an inaccurate perception of transgender individuals. At one point the performers allege that when God created Adam and Eve, he allegedly “created a third creature named Ava”. Most trans women I know identify as “Eve’s daughter”, or “woman gender”, not a “3rd gender”, or as Luna writes, “a 3rd creature”. Depicting trans women as “others”, “neither, ors” “creatures” and “impersonators” is influential in adding to the segregation and misrepresentation of trans women. While some people identify as “gender queer and 3rd gender,” none would wish to be characterized as a non-human creature. The film even introduces a new term - “tran-imal” (trans person = animal = not human) – which may be the newest trend slur of the season!

One of the characters expresses that sexual assault "turns her on.” This is sickly morbid and disturbingly insensitive, especially given the high rate of sexual attacks and violence against trans women. In another scene a nurse is sexually inappropriate with another character who is recuperating in the hospital after surviving a hate crime attack. In this way Luna’s script trivializes the crisis of violence against trans women which is horrifying and disempowering to all women.

Some of the characters have a “trans face” act that is comparable to “black face” of decades past, when white men painted their faces and depicted black people as “minstrels and subhuman”. Likewise, “trans face” is just as dehumanizing and offensive to actual trans WOMEN. Their “trans face” act is “hypersexualized, vile talking, flamboyant, gay man with women’s clothes on. “

By the end of the film, most of the characters are dead or brutalized. The film ends with a drag diva asking the others “Do you know what the difference is between us and them (the dead men on the ground)?” The answer expressed: “I don’t know,” “Me either”- film ends. So there you have it folks, “transgender women” are no different than “murdered men”.

And that last sentence pretty much sums up the message of the film.